<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KevRichard &#187; Monster Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevrichard.com/tag/monster-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevrichard.com</link>
	<description>Technology and Digital Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Monster Cable&#8217;s Ugly Fight</title>
		<link>http://kevrichard.com/2008/12/monster-cables-ugly-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://kevrichard.com/2008/12/monster-cables-ugly-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin  Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevrichard.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interesting he said,she(?) said sort of battle Monster Cable has filed suit (since dropped) with Monster MiniGolf over the use of Monster in its name arguing that it holds the legal trademark of &#8220;Monster&#8221; and only they have the right to liscence and sell it .Monster MiniGolf feeling pushed into a corner has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkevrichard.com%2F2008%2F12%2Fmonster-cables-ugly-fight%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkevrichard.com%2F2008%2F12%2Fmonster-cables-ugly-fight%2F&amp;source=kevrichard&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In an interesting  he said,she(?) said  sort of battle Monster Cable  has filed suit (since dropped) with Monster MiniGolf over the use of Monster in its name arguing that it holds  the legal trademark of &#8220;Monster&#8221; and only they have the right to liscence and sell it .Monster MiniGolf  feeling pushed into a corner has smartly brought this fight to the public via an Ebay posting  appealing to the general public to buy a $1 Monster Mini Golf coupon to defray their legal costs. Since then  this name battle has been picked up  in local news media ( ABC News 10 of California) prominent blogs (<a title="Consumerist" href="http://consumerist.com/5009190/lawsuit-monster-cable-thinks-you-might-confuse-mini+golf-with-overpriced-cables"> Consumerist</a>, <a title="Engadget" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/26/monster-cable-at-it-again-sues-mini-golf-company/">Engadget</a>)  and social news sites ( <a title="Reddit" href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/7h0ha/monster_cable_sues_family_owned_monster_minigolf/">Reddit</a>,<a title="Digg" href="http://digg.com/business_finance/Monster_Cable_Sues_Monster_MiniGolf_For_Trademark_Violation">Digg</a>) and has recieved a large negative reaction.</p>
<p>Noticing that the company is recieving a lot of negative press coverage and feedback, Monster Cable has since dropped the suit and laid out its side of the story on a page of its <a title="Monster Truth" href="http://www.monstercable.com/monster_truth/">website</a> . In a video statement from  CEO Noel Lee  the company  claims that they too are the little guy and they simply don&#8217;t want to see a franchiser make profit off their trademark ( video after post) . In an act to make the company seem less cold and uncaring they have  also asked  Monster Mini Golf to donate a monthly $100 fee to a chosen charity for use of its name .*</p>
<p>I think in the end of it all Monster Cable has wasted time and resources just to  come out looking like a bad guy and will  loose sales as a result . If they had a redo I would suggest to them that they do one of two things: either  calling Monster MiniGolf  out publicily stating that hey, you&#8217;re  using our trademark , stop or pay up  and follow it through to the end ( rather than look like a company that waivers or is just out to get people) or that they just not bother with the whole mess to begin with.</p>
<p>This is a case of dragging your ( already <a title="The Truth about Monster Cable" href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/field-notes/the-truth-about-monster-cable-266616.php">tarnished?</a>) name in the mud over an issue that most people don&#8217;t care about&#8230;. and hey if you want to protect your name so much what about  <a href="http://www.monsterenergy.com/">Monster Energy Drink</a>? I would understand  if it were a more obscure name like <a title="kevrichard" href="http://twitter.com/kevrichard">Twitter</a> or Microsoft, but with such a generic name the company shouldn&#8217;t be dependant on just the name but what product and brand attributes they stand for.</p>
<p>*Monster MiniGolf has since made a <a title="Monster Mini Golf" href="http://monsterminigolf.com/bully.html">public statement </a></p>
<p>[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljEelGaB3bE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevrichard.com/2008/12/monster-cables-ugly-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

